29 Support questions or comments

• 
  1 week ago
  dovahkiin

  1. Unreasonable Cost: This script is severely overpriced! Despite the high cost, they don’t provide full source code—only the compiled version. Meaning, for ANY technical change, you must pay the developer again. Totally illogical!
  
  2. Vague Packages & Updates: Product details and package versions are unclear. At this premium price, free lifetime updates should be mandatory, yet they seem to charge extra for every new update!
  
  3. Better Alternatives Exist: Cheaper or even free alternatives (e.g., Bold.DIY under MIT License) offer open-source solutions. For half this cost, you could hire a dev to build a superior custom version AND own the source code outright!
• View 4 more replies
• 
  1 week ago
  Starsky Author

  Thank you for your feedback. I'd like to clarify a few important points:
  Regarding Product Ownership & Experience:
  We notice this review appears to be based on assumptions rather than actual product experience. Our records don't show any purchase or trial access associated with this review, which raises questions about the validity of these specific claims.
  Current Platform & Support:
  For accurate information, please note that our script is now exclusively available and maintained on our official platform at https://monzed.com. This ensures all clients receive proper support, documentation, and resources.
  Our Actual Offering:
  
  Lifetime Updates: All verified clients receive free lifetime updates as part of our commitment to long-term value
  Full Support: We co-maintain solutions with our clients to ensure optimal performance
  Transparent Pricing: Our pricing reflects comprehensive ongoing support, not just initial delivery
  
  For Potential Clients:
  We encourage anyone interested to reach out directly through our official channels for demos, proper documentation, and transparent discussions about requirements and pricing https://monzed.com.
  
  Regards,
• 
  1 week ago
  Starsky Author

  For accurate information, please note that Starsky v3.1 is completely full source and not compiled and available at: https://monzed.com/products
  
  Regards,
• 
  1 week ago
  dovahkiin

  No, it's not based on assumptions! I corresponded with you via email and you gave contradictory answers.
• 
  1 week ago
  Starsky Author

  - Product Information - July 21, 2025
  The script is no longer compiled.
  
  - Frequently Asked Questions
  
  - Is it full source code? Yes.
  - Can I customize it? Yes.
  - Can I charge users? Yes.
  - Can I add new functionality? Yes.
  - Can you install it for me? Yes, we offer an additional installation service. This isn't just a basic installation – we assign a dedicated team member to guide you through the entire process, including post-launch troubleshooting. You can ask us any technical questions or request assistance after launch. This is ongoing support that doesn't end after installation.
  - Can you rebrand it for me? Yes, we offer professional rebranding services to make the platform match your brand's tone and visual identity.
  - Do I get future updates free? Yes.
  - Why is the script no longer on Codester? We have moved it to our official website where we will offer exclusive updates and provide more dedicated, faster support. This is an overall move to improve the user experience. Any existing Codester clients already have a dedicated client portal with access to their purchases.
  
  If you can't handle any aspect yourself, just ask us – we've got your back!
  
  I hope this clears up any confusion.
  Best regards
• 
  1 week ago
  dovahkiin

  Okay, so you came to the reasonable conclusion that it's better to remove the compile mode. If you price it reasonably (similar to other scripts in this range), then I'll buy it. Right now, your price for this 3.1 version you wrote is very imaginative and high, and no one will buy it. Especially since there are so many free and open source versions.
• 
  1 week ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  The price has already been reduced by 26% and is very affordable considering the additional services that come with it. We are not an ordinary company that will sell you software and then abandon you.
  
  The current price on https://monzed.com remains the same.
  
  You have the right to explore other open source solutions and pay developers 10x the price to add payment integrations and features for you.
  
  Regards,
• 
  1 week ago
  dovahkiin

  I have carefully reviewed your project. The real value is at the highest possible level for the regular version, $49, and the commercial version, $99! No more! I just said it is much higher than the range of similar projects you have.
  It doesn't matter if you like it or not, it's the truth! Otherwise, you won't have any buyers and it will remain at the level of just 2 people who have bought it, one of whom is you!

• 
  2 weeks ago
  Janoon

  Hi,
  After reviewing your project, it appears to be identical to the open-source project Bold.DIY (MIT License) with only minor design changes, such as a red color scheme. While I understand that the MIT license allows reuse, the architecture and functionality seem to have been replicated without significant modification.
  
  This raises serious concerns as to why customers should pay a substantial amount for a product that is essentially the same as a freely available open-source project on GitHub. Additionally, I noticed that you have not provided any attribution or credits to the original open-source authors, which is a violation of open-source ethics and community standards.
  
  I have also reviewed feedback from other authors who raised similar points. Dismissing these concerns by simply stating that it is "original work" is not acceptable when clear similarities exist.
  
  Please respect open-source projects and their creators by providing proper acknowledgment. If this issue is not addressed, I will have no choice but to report it to the relevant platforms.
• 
  2 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  We have updated our overview to clear up any future confusion or duplicate questions!
  Thanks

• 
  2 weeks ago
  anir213bis

  First question: Is there a restore system when creating a project?
  Is there a memory system so that the site remembers the same project? If not, can you create a log file that will be created for each project?
• 
  2 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  The project snapshots are saved securely in the database and are loaded automatically whenever you open your project, allowing you to continue your progress.
  
  Regards,

• 
  2 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  Have you made recent changes ? because main demo site not working starsky.app and in the place of starsky.app , https://sharelock.cc/ is showing .

• 
  3 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  I am ready to buy , if you add other popular models of Azure AI like Grok, cohere, claude, Mistral , qwen coder 3 or family.
• 
  2 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  Azure OpenAI is already supported.
  As for the others, there are no plans for those for the next update.
  Regards,
• 
  2 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  OK, No Problem.

• 
  3 weeks ago
  cr8ball Purchased

  I don't see if webcontainers.io API is not required in the requirements section. Can you confirm? Thanks. Is the requirements are up to date?
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  WebContainers.io runs entirely in the browser and creates a virtualized environment without needing external API calls or keys. The library handles everything locally, so there's no API key requirement in the setup process.
  Yes, all requirements are up to date.
  Regards,
• 
  3 weeks ago
  cr8ball Purchased

  Thanks for confirming.

• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  v3.1 Update (20 July 2025)
  
  🚀 New Features
  
  ✅ Introducing Figma importing
  ✅ Adding deploy to cPanel
  ✅ Support for Anthropic Claude Opus 4 model and OpenAI Azure provider
  ✅ Ability to import folders from existing project on your desktop, clone repositories
  ✅ Added Cloudflare Captcha Turnstile support
  
  🎨 Improvements
  
  ✅ Improve the projects display improving UX with actions and filtering, instead of the left sidebar panel
  ✅ Improved the overall UX
  ✅ Minor bug fixes and improvements
  
  If you want to suggest any feature or improvement for the upcoming updates feel free to leave them in the support section.
  
  Try it: https://starsky.app
  
  Regards,

• 
  3 weeks ago
  devi0us

  I'm sorry but isn't this literally just a reskin of Bolt.diy (eg. Bolt.new which is open sourced and fully available on GitHub)? I thought it looked very similar and then when I clicked the preview in a new tab button, I was greeted with the identical bolt page with the same hyperlinks to stackblitz (the company who created bolt.new). It just seems a little dishonest to market and sell the source code for an app that's just been slightly changed from an already open sourced project. Care to explain?
• View 7 more replies
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  The preview functionality you're seeing uses WebContainers API, which is a browser-based runtime technology created by StackBlitz. This is a publicly available technology that any developer can integrate - it's not exclusive to Bolt. When you see StackBlitz branding or links, that's because WebContainers is their underlying infrastructure that powers in-browser code execution. You can learn more about this at https://webcontainers.io/ and their API documentation at https://webcontainers.io/api.
  
  Is this just a reskin of bolt.new? Clearly not. We've been inspired by several platforms including bolt.new and Lovable, but we basically loved the preview system used by Bolt, so we decided to implement something similar. Starsky has major advanced architectural changes and features, with a SaaS-ready infrastructure.
  
  Instead of calling it a reskin, you should do some research, as we drew inspiration from many platforms including Bolt and Lovable. Not to copy these platforms, but actually to build something better than them and offer it to the community and businesses who wish to create such software, or want to use it for personal use.
  
  If you have anything unclear or want clarification, feel free to ask. We're here to answer any confusion.
  
  Regards
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Uddipan242

  It's Bolt.diy with just changes in CSS. Here's the system prompt: the artifacts contain <boltArtifact> 😄.
  
  Full system prompt: https://pastebin.com/wuf8UDFP
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  As mentioned above "Instead of calling it a reskin, you should do some research, as we drew inspiration from many platforms including Bolt and Lovable. Our goal was not to copy these platforms, but actually to build something better than them."
  Try exploring what Starsky offers using "changes in CSS" this will explain the pricing. You get the full source code, and we maintain the project as SaaS for our community vision and people love our product and service.
  We have a dedicated, talented team developing Starsky almost daily. Bolt.new is an open source, unmaintained project their last commit was a year ago, and we have the rights to draw inspiration from their preview as explained above, which any developer has the right to use through their containers (https://webcontainers.io) or even use their artifacts.
  I hope this clears up any confusion, and if you have any questions or any features you'd like to add, feel free to ask we'll be happy to answer!
  Regards,
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  We have updated our overview to clear up any future confusion or duplicate questions!
  Thanks
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Uddipan242

  Bolt.diy is not an unmaintained project what are you talking about? It's getting PRs, was just updated 3 days ago
  
  https://github.com/stackblitz-labs/bolt.diy
• 
  3 weeks ago
  devi0us

  Yeah after looking more at your offering, it's abundantly clear that you've taken the open source bolt.diy project, which despite your claims is 1000% actively maintained and constantly having new additions added near-daily, and modified a few aspects of it to make it appear as if it's unique. It's pretty disappointing to see and it hurts the open source community when people do this.
• 
  3 weeks ago
  devi0us

  I hope you at least included the LICENSE file from the original repo, as per the MIT licensing conditions.
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello devi0us,
  
  We want to clarify that while our project may share some UI similarities with bolt.diy or bolt.new, it is not a copy. Our codebase is original, and any inspiration drawn from publicly available open source components as is common in open source development was within the bounds of acceptable use.
  
  That said, out of respect for the broader open source community, we’ve added a mention in our overview acknowledging inspiration where applicable
  
  We support open source, but we also stand by the originality of our product 😊.
  Best regards,
• 
  2 weeks ago
  ePearlSoft

  Hi all,
  
  Thank you for your earlier clarification. However, I still have some concerns regarding the originality of the codebase, as there appear to be significant similarities with bolt.diy or bolt.new. It feels as though the project might be heavily based on copied open source code that was modified with Sass, rather than being an entirely original creation.
  
  I fully support open source collaboration and appreciate the value of building upon existing work, but transparency and proper credit are essential.
  
  Could you please provide more details on the extent of the original work versus modifications? This will help clarify any doubts and foster a fair understanding of your project’s uniqueness.
  
  I look forward to your response.
• 
  2 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  Our codebase is completely original and bears no resemblance to the projects you mentioned. We legally incorporate select open-source components, but our core architecture is entirely proprietary.
  Review our demo at https://sharelock.cc
  we're preparing a major update that will clearly demonstrate our platform's unique innovation.
  We stand behind the originality of our work.
  
  Regards,

• 
  3 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  Any future plan to add these -
  1. UI/UX designer using AI
  2. Mobile App Builder
• View 3 more replies
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  The features mentioned are already built in.
  For mobile apps starsky already includes and supports full Expo integration for buildings cross platform mobile apps.
  
  https://ibb.co/HLfpmVPn
  
  Regards,
• 
  3 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  What about UI/UX and android/ios
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  1. UI/UX Designer Using AI
  Starsky already includes intelligent design assistance to streamline the UI/UX process. It offers built in visual tools and smart suggestions that help with layout, components, and styling.
  
  2. Mobile App (Android/iOS)
  Yes, Starsky fully supports mobile app development through Expo integration. This means you can build and preview cross-platform apps (iOS and Android) directly within the platform. Once you're ready, you can use Expo’s EAS Build service to generate production ready builds (.apk/.aab for Android and .ipa for iOS) and submit them to the Google Play Store or Apple App Store.
  
  Regards,
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  OpenAI Azure is now supported along with Claude opus 4
  
  Regards,
• 
  3 weeks ago
  borntechmedia

  Any option to check admin panel for testing.
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  The platform uses the Supabase dashboard to manage users, plans, etc.
  We cannot share demo credentials to maintain user confidentiality.

• 
  3 weeks ago
  MrDRxICT

  Hi I’m looking to buy this script is there a limit to the size of project I can built with it thanks
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  Hello,
  
  Thank you for your interest!
  
  There are no technical size limits for projects you can build with our script. Each project, regardless of its complexity or size, is automatically optimized and bundled efficiently by the containers technology.
  
  You can build everything from simple single-page applications to complex multi-component projects without worrying about size constraints.
  
  Feel free to reach out if you have any other questions!
  
  Best regards
• 
  3 weeks ago
  MrDRxICT

  Great so there is no container limit, my projects are big
  
  Plus when would you be adding this below as most of my projects are on GitHub already
  GitHub Integration - Clone repositories and push changes directly from Starsky
  
  Thanks
  
• 
  3 weeks ago
  Starsky Author

  The features you mentioned already exist: GitHub Integration - Clone repositories and push & sync changes directly from Starsky
  
  showcased in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FyJNHBltQ
  
  Regards,